Recent Posts
Connect with:
Tuesday / May 21.
HomeminewsAphra to Review Criminal History Standard

Aphra to Review Criminal History Standard

Australia’s health practitioner regulator, Ahpra, and the National Boards are reviewing the criminal history standard to make sure it is up to date and relevant. This work is part of the health practitioner regulator’s blueprint for reform to strengthen public safety in health regulation, which has a focus on sexual misconduct in healthcare.

The regulator is asking for community feedback on the standard by 13 September.

We look forward to hearing from patients, the public, practitioners and anyone who wants to share their feedback…

The Criminal history registration standard (the criminal history standard) sets out what decision-makers think about when a registered health practitioner, or someone wanting to become one, has a criminal history. It helps to ensure that only people who are suitable are registered as health practitioners.

All practitioners are required to undergo a criminal history check when they first apply for registration. They must also declare any change when they annually renew their registration.

In 2021/22, Ahpra and the National Boards received 75,543 domestic and international criminal history checks of practitioners and/or applicants, with only a few results serious enough to affect a practitioner’s registration. Of those, 15 applicants were granted registration with restrictions, while six had their application refused.

“Our priority has always been to protect the public and make healthcare safer. This review, as part of our greater reform of our approach to sexual boundary notifications, is an important opportunity to ensure healthcare is safe for patients and in-line with community expectations,” Ahpra CEO Martin Fletcher said.

“We look forward to hearing from patients, the public, practitioners and anyone who wants to share their feedback on the standard, to inform future proposals for change.”

Applying Principles

Aphra is consulting on explaining how the principles apply in action, for example, whether it would be helpful to group into categories according to seriousness.

For example:

• Category A could include criminal offences that are incompatible with registration because they involve such serious disregard for the harm to others and such a significant breach of the trust and confidence placed in registered health practitioners such as murder and serious sexual assault.

• Category B could include offences that may or may not be incompatible with registration, depending on factors, such as whether the individual can demonstrate circumstances to prove there is no longer risk to the public. An example could be theft involving no violence or breach of trust.

• Category C could include offences that are unlikely to be relevant to the practice of a health profession, such as minor drug offences, traffic offences, or public nuisance.

Focus Areas for Future

Aphra is also seeking comments on the future direction for other focus areas of its work to improve public safety in health regulation, including:

• Plans to better explain and publish more information about how decisions relating to criminal history and professional misconduct by registered health practitioners are made,

• Whether information about decisions to re-register practitioners who were previously removed from practice because of serious professional misconduct can be published, and

• More support for people who are affected by professional misconduct by registered health practitioners.

Consultation is open and closes on 14 September 2023. Make a submission to Aphra here.